dtla secret places!
Thread started by
bfeinzimer at 09.27.09 - 9:32 pm
ok so lets share some secrets...shhhhh
chill spots downtown...top of the standard during the day, fire escapes in the westin bonnaventure, where else??
reply
then they won't be secrets anymore...
snowcone09.27.09 - 9:35 pm
reply
lol i have one but its so secret that if i told i have to give you a flat =)
andres84 responding to a
comment by snowcone
09.27.09 - 9:51 pm
reply
640 n spring st at 9:30pm on wednesdays
braydon09.27.09 - 10:22 pm
reply
oh yeah... that is a romantic spot... i took your mom up there and fucked her from behind as she braced herself against the windows with her tender breasts pressed against the cold glass.
snowcone responding to a
comment by User1
09.27.09 - 10:28 pm
reply
Dude, you got the best mom jokes!
Don't ever slow down.
User1 responding to a
comment by snowcone
09.27.09 - 10:32 pm
reply
He spent more time on that mom joke than he did on this lameass "quote" function.
PC responding to a
comment by User1
09.27.09 - 10:34 pm
reply
Exactly.
PC responding to a
comment by snowcone
09.27.09 - 10:37 pm
reply
oh.. you mean the excerpt from my latest erotic novel?
snowcone responding to a
comment by PC
09.27.09 - 10:41 pm
reply
Right. That thing. You worked harder on it, apparently, than you did on this shitty attribution function pretending to be a quote function. That's more or less what I was hinting at (and by "hinting at" I mean "stating outright in a simple declarative sentence") earlier. Are you all caught up now?
PC responding to a
comment by snowcone
09.27.09 - 10:46 pm
reply
i don't know if i can believe you because it looks like you are putting it to good use.
admit it.. you like it you do. it serves the same purpose as quoting without being as obtrusive.
snowcone responding to a
comment by PC
09.27.09 - 10:55 pm
reply
It's not really a quote function anyway. it only shows who you are responding to.
la duderina09.27.09 - 10:57 pm
reply
looks like you're going to need some tissues...
snowcone responding to a
comment by la duderina
09.27.09 - 10:58 pm
reply
cool... these are some pretty awesome spots in DTLA
thanks guys
snowcone09.27.09 - 11:02 pm
reply
i don't know if i can believe you because it looks like you are putting it to good use.
I'm putting it to the best possible use it can be put to, which is not the same thing at all as putting it to good use.
it serves the same purpose as quoting
No, it doesn't. Even assuming that users will click on the "comment" link to see what exact posts people are responding to, which I seriously doubt, it doesn't provide any information as to which part of the post is being addressed. So, to make this clear to readers, the poster either has to
a) do what I just did and insert the pertinent quotes, thus making your "quote" function (as I keep saying, it's actually an attribution function) entirely superfluous; or
b) phrase his own reply in such a way as to remind readers of what he's responding to, like we use to have to do with friggin' snail mail (or on the web, before there was REAL quoting functionality in forum software). "And regarding your second question, darling, of
course Muffy and I are free on Saturday..."
without being as obtrusive
A useless function is nothing but obtrusive.
PC responding to a
comment by snowcone
09.27.09 - 11:08 pm
reply
you keep quoting the word "quote", but i don't think i've ever referred to it as a quoting function. if you want to quote, then you can do what you just did. my function does something slightly different, so it doesn't serve the same purpose in call cases, but most of the time you just want to let people know what you are responding to, and then it serves that purpose. i actually do click the link to see the comment when it's not clear to me what the person is talking about. maybe other people do not, but no one has complained about the function until now. maybe you should suggest a better idea.
snowcone responding to a
comment by PC
09.27.09 - 11:13 pm
reply
oh yeah.... it also lets you see the post to which you are replying... don't you love that too?
snowcone responding to a
comment by PC
09.27.09 - 11:18 pm
reply
@braydon
There are like 15 other threads about chill spots in DTLA. so yeah...
la duderina09.27.09 - 11:19 pm
reply
i want to hear your opinion of
The Function fatty
snowcone responding to a
comment by la duderina
09.27.09 - 11:19 pm
reply
@snowcone
see? you can see what I am responding to with a simple @
sooo your function is simply a glorified @
la duderina09.27.09 - 11:19 pm
reply
OHHHH WHAT? did you purposely not use the "reply to" just now? ASS
snowcone responding to a
comment by la duderina
09.27.09 - 11:20 pm
reply
you can't distinguish between multiple posts from the same user with the @ :P
snowcone responding to a
comment by la duderina
09.27.09 - 11:21 pm
reply
it's more of a term of endearment <3
snowcone responding to a
comment by la duderina
09.27.09 - 11:21 pm
reply
GLORIFIED @
hello.
and why the fuck are you calling me names?
when the fuck did calling names become ok on this forum?
la duderina09.27.09 - 11:22 pm
reply
maybe you should suggest a better idea.
How about a quote function?
PC responding to a
comment by snowcone
09.27.09 - 11:26 pm
reply
"GLORIFIED @"
so... what you're telling me is that you like it?
snowcone responding to a
comment by la duderina
09.27.09 - 11:27 pm
reply
I like the function. It's you I have the problem with.
la duderina09.27.09 - 11:28 pm
reply
term of endearment... did you miss that?
snowcone responding to a
comment by la duderina
09.27.09 - 11:28 pm
reply
it looks like you already have the quote function mastered
snowcone responding to a
comment by PC
09.27.09 - 11:29 pm
reply
ok im too stoned and i got lost in this shenanigans..this thread suked balls! i rally wanted to know some secret spots..boo!!
Huey55509.27.09 - 11:29 pm
reply
"GLORIFIED @"
so... what you're telling me is that you like it?
Now I'm starting to understand why people asked for one thing and you gave them another.
PC responding to a
comment by snowcone
09.27.09 - 11:30 pm
reply
i know what people want more than they do
snowcone responding to a
comment by PC
09.27.09 - 11:34 pm
reply
please, "fatty" and "ass" are not terms of endearment. Use whatever excuse you want, but those are derogatory terms and keep using words like that towards me and we are going to have a problem.
I don't know what has been going on with this forum lately but this name calling has got to stop. It is one thing to not get along. It's a whole other thing to sit here and insult each other.
Snowcone, just because you happened to do a little work on the forum doesn't mean you own this shit. Doesn't mean you are the King fucken Midnight Rida. You typed a little bit of code. GET. THE FUCK. OVER YOURSELF. and stop being a fucking DICK.
la duderina responding to a
comment by snowcone
09.27.09 - 11:34 pm
reply
And it wasn't even very good code, is the funny thing.
PC responding to a
comment by la duderina
09.27.09 - 11:35 pm
reply
i'm sorry, i didn't mean to offend you.
snowcone responding to a
comment by la duderina
09.27.09 - 11:40 pm
reply
i know i don't own it.... i keep my personal life separate from my professional life.
snowcone responding to a
comment by la duderina
09.27.09 - 11:44 pm
reply
give me a break.
what exactly do you think happens when you call people derogatory names? An angel gets its wings?
Don't give me your cop-out bullshit.
Oh, and don't think that you offend me Snowcone. I don't get offended by
PC, let alone you
la duderina responding to a
comment by snowcone
09.27.09 - 11:51 pm
reply
snowcone honey, maybe it's best that you and la duderina not play with each other anymore.
your mom responding to a
comment by snowcone
09.27.09 - 11:56 pm
reply
hey pc... can you tell me what forum application has your favorite implementation of the quoting function? thanks in advance.
snowcone09.28.09 - 1:44 am
reply
HOLY SHIT AHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHA
i just realized what you were doing... that was brilliant
snowcone responding to a
comment by braydon
09.28.09 - 3:17 am
reply
-->
Ridazz Roulette!
